2] our additions for readability in [brackets]3] glyphs or terms in (dark green);
4] doubtful words, contexts or lines slanted ;
5] all smooth-running lines in normal yellow font;
6] notes about text: end of page;
7] divisions within stanzas marked with -;
8] apparent continuing stanzas suffixed by a +.
9] when quoting directly from Budge,quoted text is in orange color .
though we can read sharper, the different coffins vary in using either II ('double'), or
\ \ ('magically-dangerous'), as two total different meanings; when not sure we used (double \ \ ),
until that certain concept will have proven itself;
# perhaps open new tab for notes
d] [by means of] the double cherub-wheel [to make the new-root] (sep+). to complete.,
[for this N.]. [as] existence (matrix). [through] he. existence (eden’s). to give. speech.;
[as] he. the sweetness (ntchm, serp-hand). [of] speech.,
c] [yet] the divine word for to make the doubled-adamite-soul (?,sssu+). [by?] the workplace. [as?] existence. nót.;
[but instead, for] my. existence. to become the essence of the mouth to stretch-out [of gate to new-root] (psg+).,
b] [as?] the word. [being?] the things of the eden-light of speech [at place-T] (ter+).,
of [=for]. [this N’s.]. existence (matrix). [by] the (festival of) completion of the solarplane (h’eb).;
to become (áu). +
a] [by] Neith. the divine things by place-T of the most-beautified-soul-adam for the solarplane of hail (ábit+).;
- – line d] to complete,
see notes of same theme in CT 133; line seems okay;
|
ebay |
- it does not appear to write ‘to invoke’ NÁS but seperate N+ÁS, instead;
at times, the continuing of the line can show what is probably ment,
after the negation comes the “but instead”,
he says “that the word is coming from below”, so it intends to say that
“the word to become the divine word to can make the doubled soul”…? - – line c] workplace
at new-hand, - – line b] eden-light,
in column B in Sq4c; as the place-T where eden-word becomes eden-speech,
and located at the original-adamite-throne;
B2L is an ‘ambiguous form’ as the note states; suppose it were SA as depicted,
then “the word the things to inverse for my existence” etc; this inversion likely
through the inverted-cherub-wheel at the new-hand
(and then the light going up further north to Rã, Geb and the solarplane), - The word goes Up, from the cherub-wheels at the original adamite-throne,
to the ascended wheel at the new-hand; that (must be) the stretching-out;
making Neith the raised-cord region + the intersection of q and k-axis,
or “as the region between the two suns in the mural in 133”.
Compare the sigil in column B, where the arrows are the crossing with k-axis; - making the middle-registers of amtuat to be this region,
the 4 Neiths should be then (mutilated) aspects of the four cherubs, - the place-T of m-b-soul-adam as new-hand,
glyph linked to ÁB, torso, ÁBBAIT ‘appolyon’ and UBA, see CT 131,