CT 141

e] the M-realm. to complete (t’em-m)., through T’em [new-hand] (T’em). [for this N.].,
d] [and so] the dimension [north]. of [=as]. the land (eden?). [of] the M-realm. [and] the sky of earth. [of] the M-realm.,

c] he. [for] the divine ones by place-T of the abzu (abt+). [as this N.]. to embrace [existence to make the kh-house] (skhn+).

b] [for] the dimension (north). [of] speech., [as] the land. [of] speech. [and] the sky of earth (north). [of] speech.;

[and so for this N]. thou. [existence?]., of [=by] (means of). +
a] Geb (land upon cube). to divinely complete (T’em)., [and through?] the divine light (rã). to be hail (hail+passive).;

Sq3sq is coffin with different syntax as others,
as CT 142 not easy to can follow;

• – line e] M-realm,
  see textglyph, column e];
  the extra M should be an object to ‘go complete’;
  alternatively it could be a contraction of ‘to complete’ T’EM and ‘alike adam’ MM,
  but we opt for M-realm, see d],
• – line e] T’em,
  the squatting deity in column e];
  he is representing the ‘slide’, think of the Tutankhamen shrine is standing upon one;
  perhaps reading “the divine slide for the M-realm by the new-hand”,
  where he represents the rule of their new-hand construct.
  The occasional showing ‘negation’ within the t’em-glyph is not yet clear to us –
  we could read it as “in-complete”, but “divine incomplete” makes no Sense here;
• The eden-hand (as executive region) was first cut-off by (the lynx) MA-F-T’T,
  “the hand of he-eden to reap”; and T’EM follows upon the action of T’+MA-T,
  “place-T-eden to reap for the new-hand”, the order of glyphs inversed.
• 1)In tuat 1 a ‘mat’ hangs in the prow of Rã’s boat, as T’EMAT, which must then
  already represent the reaped hand, being ferried to the north;
• 2) Adam is within this new-hand,
  they dropped the -A from AT’M (Adam) into T’M (T’em), but you see that the
  attributes are all closely linked,
• 3) and if we extend analogies, TEMAn in scripture belongs to Esau-Edom;
  in Jer. 49 is a line addressed “against the inhabitants of Teman”,
  which we here link to the glyph T’EMIÁ, “land alike-adam’s by the new-hand”,
  a term occasionally used in spells.
  Amos 2 reads “..I will send a fire upon Teman, devouring it’s citadels”,
• – line d] M-realm,
  first we had “the dimension by the land for the sky of earth by he the divine ones, etc”,
  but the causal reasoning was impossible;
  therefore we consider, since he started with M-realm in e],
  he intended the same in this line also;
• supportive is here ‘dimension’, as MU, ending upon -M, M-realm;
  and compare similar stanza-form in line b],
• – line b] by means of,
  though also here an -M, we consider the line to run on,
  either way a ‘by’ would follow, as conclusion;
• – line b] [existence]
  there is a small space lost, and ‘existence’ could fit here
  (unlikely the adamite-soul -S),
• – line a] Geb
  we do not yet know what can be the difference between T’EMIÁ and GEB [solarplane B],
  likely Geb is another linked region more North, above this region of the new-hand,